创新链/学科链/研发链/产业链

新药研发前沿动态 / 医药领域趋势进展

不同疗程雾化吸入布地奈德治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的疗效及气道炎症机制研究

Effects of Different Treatment Courses of Nebulized Budesonide on Efficacy and Airway Inflammation Mechanisms in Acute Exacerbation Stage of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

  • 摘要: 目的 研究不同疗程雾化吸入布地奈德对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,COPD)急性加重期患者的疗效及气道炎症机制。方法 选择2022年1月至2024年12月淮安市淮安医院接诊的120例COPD急性加重期患者进行研究,采用随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,各60例,对照组给予布地奈德混悬液雾化吸入,每次2 mg,每天2次,5 d为1个疗程,治疗2个疗程;观察组给予布地奈德混悬液雾化吸入,每次2 mg,每天2次,5 d为1个疗程,共治疗4个疗程。比较2组临床疗效、炎症因子、气道重塑、肺功能及不良反应发生率。结果 治疗结束后,观察组总有效率高于对照组,金属蛋白酶组织抑制因子-1(tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase-1,TIMP-1)、白三烯B4(leukotriene B4,LT-B4)、转化生长因子β1(transforminggrowth factor-β1,TGF-β1)水平低于对照组,管壁面积、管腔面积大于对照组,气管厚度小于对照组,第1秒用力呼气容积(forced expiratory volume in one second,FEV1)、一秒率FEV1/用力肺活量(forced vital capacity,FVC),FEV1/FVC高于对照组(P < 0.05);2组的TIMP-1、LT-B4、TGF-β1较治疗前降低,管壁面积、管腔面积较治疗前增大,气管厚度较治疗前减小,FEV1和FEV1/FVC较治疗前升高(P < 0.05)。治疗后3个月和1年,2组的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者自我评估测试评分降低,且观察组低于对照组(P < 0.05)。治疗期间,2组不良反应发生率比较无明显统计学差异(P > 0.05)。结论 长疗程雾化吸入布地奈德治疗COPD急性加重期可提升治疗效果,降低体内炎症因子水平,改善肺功能。

     

    Abstract: Objective To investigate the efficacy of different treatment courses of nebulized budesonide in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and its mechanism on airway inflammation. Methods A total of 120 patients with acute exacerbation of COPD admitted to Huai'an Huai'an Hospital from January 2022 to December 2024. The patients were randomly divided into an intervention group and a control group, with 60 cases in each. The control group received nebulization inhalation of budesonide suspension at 2 mg per dose, twice daily for two treatment courses, with each course lasting 5 days. The intervention group also received the same regimen for four 5-day treatment courses. The clinical efficacy, inflammatory factors, airway remodeling, pulmonary function, and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results After treatment, the total effective rate in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group. The levels of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1), leukotriene B4 (LT-B4), and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) in the intervention group were lower than those in the control group. The wall area and lumen area in the intervention group were larger than those in the control group, while the tracheal wall thickness was smaller. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and FEV1/FVC ratio were higher in the observation group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). In both groups, TIMP-1, LT-B4, and TGF-β1 levels decreased compared to before treatment; wall area and lumen area increased compared to before treatment; tracheal wall thickness decreased compared to before treatment; and FEV1 and FEV1/FVC increased compared to before treatment (P < 0.05). At 3 months and 1 year after treatment, the COPD assessment test scores decreased in both groups, and were lower in the intervention group than in the control group (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups during treatment (P > 0.05). Conclusion A longer treatment course of nebulized budesonide for acute exacerbation of COPD can improve therapeutic efficacy, reduce the levels of inflammatory factors, and enhance lung function.

     

/

返回文章
返回