创新链/学科链/研发链/产业链

新药研发前沿动态 / 医药领域趋势进展

Narcotrend监测下不同麻醉深度对胃肠道肿瘤手术患者免疫功能、苏醒质量的影响

Effects of Different Anesthesia Depths Under Narcotrend Monitoring on Immune Function and Recovery Quality in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Tumor Surgery

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨Narcotrend监测下不同麻醉深度对腹腔镜下胃肠道肿瘤手术患者免疫功能及苏醒质量的影响。方法 以2023年5月至2024年12月于联勤保障部队第940医院行腹腔镜下胃肠道肿瘤手术的210例患者为研究对象,按照随机数字表法将患者分为A组(浅度麻醉)、B组(中度麻醉)、C组(深度麻醉),各70例,比较3组的T淋巴细胞亚群、血流动力学等指标。结果 A组术后即刻(T3)、术后24 h(T5)的CD3+T、CD4+T、CD8+T、自然杀伤(natural killer,NK)细胞水平高于B组和C组(P < 0.05),A组T5的CD4+T/CD8+T高于B组和C组(P < 0.05),A组术后72 h(T6)的CD3+T、CD4+T、CD8+T、NK细胞水平和CD4+T/CD8+T高于C组(P < 0.05);B组T3、T5、T6的CD3+T、CD4+T、CD8+T、NK细胞水平高于C组(P < 0.05),B组T3、T5的CD4+T/CD8+T高于C组(P < 0.05)。A组与B组的苏醒时间短于C组(P < 0.05),3组间丙泊酚用量为C组> B组> A组(P < 0.05)。A组气管插管前(T1)、气管插管即刻(T2)、T3、拔管时(T4)的心率(heart rate,HR)快于B组和C组(P < 0.05),A组T1~T4的平均动脉压(mean arterial pressure,MAP)高于B组和C组(P < 0.05);B组T4的HR慢于C组(P < 0.05),B组T1~T4的MAP高于C组(P < 0.05)。A组和B组的恶心和(或)反酸发生率低于C组(P < 0.05),A组的躁动发生率高于B组和C组(P < 0.05)。结论 在腹腔镜下胃肠道肿瘤手术中,中、深度麻醉在维持免疫功能、血流动力学稳定方面优于浅度麻醉,但两者在躁动等风险控制方面,中度麻醉安全性更高。

     

    Abstract: Objective To investigate the effects of different anesthesia depths under Narcotrend monitoring on immune function and recovery quality in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal tumor surgery. Methods A total of 210 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrointestinal tumor surgery at The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force from May 2023 to December 2024 were enrolled. Using a random number table, the patients were assigned to three groups (n = 70 each): group A (light anesthesia), group B (moderate anesthesia), and group C (deep anesthesia). Parameters including T lymphocyte subsets and hemodynamics were compared among the three groups. Results The levels of CD3+ T, CD4+ T, CD8+ T, and natural killer (NK) cells in group A were higher than those in groups B and C immediately after surgery (T3) and at 24 h postoperatively (T5) (P < 0.05). The CD4+ T/CD8+ T ratio at T5 in group A was higher than that in groups B and C (P< 0.05). At 72 h postoperatively (T6), the levels of CD3+T, CD4+T, CD8+T, NK cells, and the CD4+T/ CD8+ T ratio in group A were higher than those in group C (P < 0.05). The levels of CD3+ T, CD4+ T, CD8+ T, and NK cells in group B at T3, T5, and T6 were higher than those in group C (P < 0.05), and the CD4+ T/CD8+ T ratios at T3 and T5 were higher than those in group C (P < 0.05). The recovery time in groups A and B was shorter than that in group C (P < 0.05). The propofol consumption among the three groups was in the order of group C > group B > group A (P < 0.05). The heart rate (HR) in group A was faster than that in groups B and C before tracheal intubation (T1), immediately after intubation (T2), at T3, and at extubation (T4) (P < 0.05), and the mean arterial pressure (MAP) from T1 to T4 was higher than that in groups B and C (P < 0.05). The HR in group B at T4 was slower than that in group C (P < 0.05), and the MAP from T1 to T4 was higher than that in group C (P < 0.05). The incidence of nausea and/or acid reflux in groups A and B was lower than that in group C (P < 0.05), while the incidence of agitation in group A was higher than that in groups B and C (P < 0.05). Conclusion In laparoscopic gastrointestinal tumor surgery, both moderate and deep anesthesia are superior to light anesthesia in maintaining immune function and hemodynamic stability. However, regarding risk control such as agitation, moderate anesthesia demonstrates a better safety profile.

     

/

返回文章
返回