创新链/学科链/研发链/产业链

新药研发前沿动态 / 医药领域趋势进展

围术期羟考酮浓度对腰椎手术患者麻醉深度与术后恢复质量的影响

The Influence of Perioperative Oxycodone Concentration on Depth of Anesthesia and Quality of Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨围术期羟考酮浓度对腰椎手术患者麻醉深度与术后恢复质量的影响。方法 选择2023年11月至2025年4月在嘉兴大学附属中医医院接受腰椎手术的120例患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为3组,每组40例。3组麻醉诱导、维持方式均相同,A组羟考酮使用剂量为0.05 mg· kg-1、B组为0.08 mg· kg-1、C组为0.12 mg· kg-1。比较3组围术期情况及麻醉诱导前(T0)、气管插管时(T1)、手术开始后30 min(T2)、术毕(T3)时的平均动脉压(mean arterial pressure,MAP)、心率(heartrate,HR)、脑电双频指数(bispectral index,BIS),并比较3组术后4、8、12、24 h的视觉模拟评分法(Visual AnalogueScale,VAS)评分及不良反应。结果 与B组、C组比较,A组苏醒时间更短,且术中舒芬太尼用量更多;B组苏醒时间短于C组,术中舒芬太尼用量多于C组(P < 0.05)。A组在T1时的MAP、HR高于B组、C组,且B组MAP、HR高于C组(P < 0.05)。A组在T1时的BIS高于B组、C组(P < 0.05),B组、C组在T1时的BIS差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。A组在术后4 h的VAS评分高于B组、C组,且B组高于C组(P < 0.05)。B组的不良反应总发生率低于A组、C组(P < 0.05)。结论 与0.05、0.12 mg·kg-1剂量相比,0.08 mg·kg-1的羟考酮更有助于稳定腰椎手术患者术中麻醉深度,对术后苏醒时间影响小、镇痛效果满意,保证术后恢复质量,且安全性好,值得临床推广。

     

    Abstract: Objective To investigate the effects of perioperative oxycodone concentration on depth of anesthesia and postoperative recovery quality in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Methods A total of 120 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery at the Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Jiaxing University from November 2023 to April 2025 were enrolled. They were randomly divided into three groups using a random number table method, with 40 cases in each. All groups received identical induction of anesthesia and operative maintenance, except for the oxycodone dose. The oxycodone doses were 0.05 mg·kg-1 in group A, 0.08 mg·kg-1 in group B, and 0.12 mg · kg-1 in group C. Perioperative parameters were compared. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and bispectral index (BIS) were recorded at the following time points: before induction of anesthesia (T0), during tracheal intubation (T1), 30 minutes after surgical incision (T2), and at the end of the operation (T3). Postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours, and the incidence of adverse reactions were also compared among the groups. Results Compared with group B and C, group A had a shorter recovery time but required a higher intraoperative dosage of sufentanil. Group B had a shorter recovery time in than group C, but used more intraoperative sufentanil than group C (P < 0.05). At T1, MAP and HR in group A were higher than those in group B and C, and these parameters in group B were higher than those in group C (P < 0.05). The BIS at T1 was higher in Group A than that in group B and C (P < 0.05), while no statistically significant difference was found between group B and C (P > 0.05). The VAS score at 4 hours postoperatively was higher in group A than in group B and C, and higher in group B than group C (P < 0.05). The total incidence of adverse reactions in group B was lower than that in group A and C (P < 0.05). Conclusion Compared to doses of 0.05 mg · kg-1 and 0.12 mg · kg-1, oxycodone at a dose of 0.08 mg · kg-1 is more effective in stabilizing the depth of anesthesia during lumbar spine surgery. This dosage has minimal impact on postoperative recovery time, provides satisfactory analgesic, ensures quality of recovery, and demonstrates a favorable safety profile, making it worthy of clinical promotion.

     

/

返回文章
返回